Proof carbon dating is false

In the early days of radiocarbon analysis this limit was often around 20,000 radiocarbon years.

Thus, all the researcher was able to say about samples with low levels of radiocarbon was that their age was greater than or equal to 20,000 radiocarbon years (or whatever the sensitivity limit of his apparatus was).

These two measures of time will only be the same if all of the assumptions which go into the conventional radiocarbon dating technique are valid.

Even a hypothetical sample containing absolutely no radiocarbon will register counts in a radiocarbon counter because of background signals within the counter.MYTH #2 Radiocarbon dating has established the date of some organic materials (e.g., some peat deposits) to be well in excess of 50,000 years, thus rendering a recent creation (6 to 10 thousand years ago) impossible.Some organic materials do give radiocarbon ages in excess of 50,000 "radiocarbon years." However, it is important to distinguish between "radiocarbon years" and calendar years.For this reason special precautions need to be exercised when sampling materials which contain only small amounts of radiocarbon.Reports of young radiocarbon ages for coal probably all stem from a misunderstanding of one or both of these two factors.

Search for proof carbon dating is false:

proof carbon dating is false-65

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

One thought on “proof carbon dating is false”